ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2025
A Systematic Review of Research on Guided Access Cavity Preparation Endodontic Treatment: Dentin Preservation Perspectives.
Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Various Sleeve Materials on Temperature Variations During Guided Endodontic Access Cavity Preparation Utilizing Finite-Element Analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Guided Endodontic Management of Orthodontic-Induced Canal Calcification Using Static Guide: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Failure of Guided Endodontic Access in a Severely Obliterated Root Canal: A Case Report of Drill Deviation.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Custom Sleeve Parameters in Static Guided Endodontic Access: Influence on Deviation Control in Pulp Canal Obliteration.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Guided access cavity preparation (GACP) is an endodontic procedure utilizing stents, guide sleeves, or dynamic guides to facilitate the proper formation of access cavities. This paper aims to evaluate the significance of research on guided access cavity preparation in endodontic treatment concerning dentin preservation. In the context of dentin preservation, this paper provides a thorough scoping review of a variety of methodologies for evaluating the accuracy of guided access cavity preparation. Materials and Methods: Article searches were conducted using Tthe keywords "Guide Access Cavity Preparation" AND "Static Guide OR 3D Printing Template" AND "Dynamic Guide through digital databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Research articles published in English within the past five years (2019-2024) and in accordance with the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) framework were also included in the study. Articles from the meta-analysis or systematic review study type, those that were not accessible in full text or in a paid format, and those that did not assess the use of guided endodontics in endodontic surgery were excluded. This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews without Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) criteria. Results: A total of 12 articles were reviewed, encompassing various locations, designs, type, and samples, which demonstrated the use of guided access cavity preparation has significant clinical applications and can provide accurate results in endodontic therapy. Conclusion: Article searches were conducted using the keywords "Guide Access Cavity Preparation" AND 'Static Guide OR 3D Printing Template' AND" Dynamic Guide through digital databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Research articles published in English within the past five years (2019-2024) and in accordance with the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) framework were also included in the study. Articles from the meta-analysis or systematic review study type, those that were not accessible in full text or in a paid format, and those that did not assess the use of guided endodontics in endodontic surgery were excluded. This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews without Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) criteria. Studies show that advanced technologies in guided access cavity preparation endodontic treatment can improve dentin preservation, improve accuracy and predictability, particularly for root canal anomalies and difficult teeth, but clinicians must consider limitations and clinical applications. Clinicians must evaluate the limitations and clinical applications of guided endodontic access prior to its implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.