ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Correlates of Protection Against Symptomatic COVID-19: The CORSER 5 Case-Control Study.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune correlates of risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in children: a prospective, community-based cohort study.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Adapted Live SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Elicits Rapid Mucosal Immunity, Protects From Disease, and Reduces Shedding of XBB.1.5.European journal of immunology · 2026Article
- Salivary Biomarkers in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis: A Scoping Review and Evidence Map.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Establishing correlates of protection often requires large cohorts. A rapid and adaptable case-control study design can be used to identify antibody correlates of protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in serum and saliva. Methods: We designed a case-control study to compare antibody levels between cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 5 days of symptom onset and uninfected controls. Controls were matched on age, number of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine doses, time since last dose, and past episodes of infection. We quantified anti-SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal coronavirus immunoglobulin (Ig) G in serum and saliva at inclusion, 1 month, and 6 months. Results: We included 90 cases and 62 controls between February and September 2022. A boost and decay pattern of serum antibodies was observed in cases at 1 and 6 months, respectively, but not in controls. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were significantly higher in controls at inclusion both in serum (particularly antinucleocapsid IgG: 4.14 times higher compared with cases; 95% CI, 2.46-6.96) and saliva (particularly antispike for Delta variant IgG: 4.89 times higher compared with cases; 95% CI, 2.91-9.89). Saliva antibodies generally outperformed serum antibodies for case/control differentiation. Conclusions: In this case-control study, we provided evidence of correlates of protection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in saliva and serum, with saliva antibodies often outperforming serum. The finding that antibodies in saliva are a better correlate of protection than antibodies in serum may inform vaccine development by highlighting the importance of robust induction of mucosal immune responses. This study design may be used during future epidemics for the prompt assessment of correlates of protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.