ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Effect of ligamentum teres uteri preservation in laparoscopic high hernia sac ligation in children with indirect inguinal hernia.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoutinely separating the ligamentum teres uteri (LTU) intraoperatively remains an unresolved issue for female children undergoing surgery for indirect inguinal hernia (IIH).
aimTo identify the effect of LTU preservation in laparoscopic high hernia sac ligation (LHSL) in children with IIH.
methodsThe participants were 100 female children with unilateral IIH admitted from April 2022 to January 2024 to the Pediatric Surgery Department of Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital of Fujian Province. They were categorized based on LTU retention into the control group (
resultsThis study comparatively analyzed the operation time, hospitalization time, blood loss, postoperative recurrence rate, and complications (repeated pain in the inguinal region, foreign body sensation in the inguinal region, bloody exudation at the inguinal incision, and incision infection), which were all comparable between the two groups.
conclusionThe above results indicate that LTU preservation during LHSL exerts certain therapeutic benefits for children with IIH. LTU preservation does not increase hospitalization time, blood loss, postoperative recurrence rate, and complications, which is safe and feasible, compared with conventional LTU ligation. LHSL with LTU preservation should be performed if conditions permit, which is worth popularizing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.