ArticleBio-protocol2025
Protocol to Retrieve Unknown Flanking DNA Using Fork PCR for Genome Walking.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Bridging PCR-Based Genome-Walking Protocol.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
- Uracil walking primer PCR: An accurate and efficient genome-walking tool.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Protocol to Mine Unknown Flanking DNA Using PER-PCR for Genome Walking.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PCR-based genome walking is one of the prevalent techniques implemented to acquire unknown flanking genomic DNAs. The worth of genome walking includes but is not limited to cloning full-length genes, mining new genes, and discovering regulatory regions of genes. Therefore, this technique has advanced molecular biology and related fields. However, the PCR amplification specificity of this technique needs to be further improved. Here, a practical protocol based on fork PCR is proposed for genome walking. This PCR uses a fork primer set of three arbitrary primers to execute walking amplification task, where the primary fork primer mediates walking by partially annealing to an unknown flank, and the fork-like structure formed between the three primers participates in inhibiting non-target amplification. In primary fork PCR, the low-annealing temperature (25 °C) cycle allows the primary fork primer to anneal to many sites of the genome, synthesizing a cluster of single-stranded DNAs; the subsequent 65 °C cycle processes the target single-strand into double-strand via the site-specific primer; then, the remaining 65 °C cycles selectively enrich this target DNA. However, any non-target single-stranded DNA formed in the 25 °C cycle cannot be further processed in the following 65 °C cycles because it lacks an exact binding site for any primer. Secondary, or even tertiary nested fork PCR further selectively enriches the target DNA. The practicability of fork PCR was validated by walking three genes in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.