Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39872712›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Primary Neuronal Culture and Transient Transfection.

Shun-Cheng Tseng, Peng-Tzu Chen, Eric Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shun-Cheng TsengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Peng-Tzu ChenInstitute of Molecular Medicine and Bioengineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Eric HwangDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary neuronal culture and transient transfection offer a pair of crucial tools for neuroscience research, providing a controlled environment to study the behavior, function, and interactions of neurons in vitro. These cultures can be used to investigate fundamental aspects of neuronal development and plasticity, as well as disease mechanisms. There are numerous methods of transient transfection, such as electroporation, calcium phosphate precipitation, or cationic lipid transfection. In this protocol, we used electroporation for neurons immediately before plating and cationic lipid transfection for neurons that have been cultured for a few days in vitro. In our experience, the transfection efficiency of electroporation can be as high as 30%, and cationic lipid transfection has an efficiency of 1%-2%. While cationic lipid transfection has much lower efficiency than electroporation, it does offer the advantage of a higher expression level. Therefore, these transfection methods are suitable for different stages of neurons and different expression requirements. Key features • Culture of primary neurons from the CNS. • Electroporation for freshly isolated neurons in suspension. • Cationic lipid transfection for adherent neurons.

Indexed as

Adherent neuron transient transfectionNeurite outgrowthNeuronal isolationNeuronal morphologySuspension neuron transient transfection

Identifiers

PMID39872712
PMCPMC11769751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.