ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025
Caval vein obstruction resulting in right to left shunt and desaturation post-endocardial pacing implantation in a 3-year old: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Superior caval vein obstruction is a rare complication of endocardial pacing lead implantation that can result in a right to left shunt. Case summary: A 3-year-old child with type 2 Brugada syndrome presented with mild cyanosis post-endocardial pacing implantation due to evolutionary right superior caval vein obstruction. This obstruction resulted in a right to left shunt across a previously unrecognized patent levo-atrial cardinal vein associated with partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. The patient underwent endocardial pacing explantation, balloon dilation and stenting of the right superior caval vein, banding of the levo-atrial cardinal vein to left upper pulmonary vein venous channel, and implantation of an epicardial pacing system. Discussion: Levo-atrial cardinal vein and partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage with dual drainage can go undetected on cardiac imaging and may not ever cause symptoms (high left-to-right shunt or cyanosis). The levo-atrial cardinal vein and associated partial anomalous venous drainage with dual drainage was missed on multiple occasions and with multiple imaging modalities in our patient. Blood flow may not be detected in a small calibre or collapsed levo-atrial cardinal vein with pulmonary venous connection when the pulmonary vein remains widely patent and connected to the left atrium. Detailed comprehensive echocardiography of any child referred for cardiac intervention should include pulsed wave Doppler and colour flow mapping interrogation of the innominate vein from the suprasternal approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.