ArticleCJC open2025
Management of Patients with Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Chart Review.
Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) is associated with an increased incidence of cardiac morbidity and mortality. Little is known about how these patients are managed. Methods: We performed a single-centre retrospective chart review of patients referred to a postoperative clinic with the diagnosis of MINS. Patients were included if they attended the clinic at least once between September 2018 and December 2019. We extracted preoperative, in-hospital, and postdischarge data on cardiac investigations and medication use. Results: Of the 152 patients with MINS who were included, 34% had a history of coronary disease before MINS. The median peak high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) level was 122 ng/L (interquartile range, 51-259), and 78% had no associated ischemic symptoms or electrocardiographic changes. Patients underwent echocardiography and nuclear stress imaging in 87% and 30% of cases, respectively. Of those who had cardiac investigations performed and no prior history of coronary artery disease, 23% (19 of 84) had ≥ 1 regional wall-motion abnormality on echocardiogram, and 39% (13 of 34) had evidence of ischemia on nuclear stress imaging. More patients were prescribed an antithrombotic and lipid-lowering drug at discharge (79%) and at their final clinic visit (86%), compared to the number before surgery (30%). A total of 57% of patients had changes made to ≥ 1 cardiovascular medication during clinic follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with MINS followed in a postoperative clinic frequently had abnormal cardiac investigations and received medical optimization. Our findings suggest that postoperative clinics may represent an opportunity for risk mitigation after MINS, a possibility that deserves further evaluation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.