Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39872639›Full record

ArticleCJC open2025

The Canadian Heart Failure (CAN-HF) Registry: A Canadian Multicentre, Retrospective Study of Outpatients with Heart Failure.

Dimitar Saveski, Melanie Kok, Stephanie Poon, Carlos Rojas-Fernandez, Sean A Virani, George Honos, Robert McKelvie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dimitar SaveskiSt Joseph's Health Care, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Melanie KokNovartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Stephanie PoonSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carlos Rojas-FernandezNovartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sean A ViraniUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
George HonosCenter Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Robert McKelvieSt Joseph's Health Care, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) reduces events in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Despite this impact, underutilization of GDMT persists. This report sought to describe HF management in Canadian outpatients treated at specialized HF clinics (HFCs). Methods: The Canadian Heart Failure (CAN-HF) study was retrospective and observational, and it included 1775 patients from 6 Canadian outpatient HFCs, from the period January 2017-April 2020. Results: We observed improvement in prescription rates in patients with HFrEF, between their first visit and their most-recent clinic visit, across all GDMT classes, in those who were followed at the HFC for ≥ 6 months. The largest prescription rate increases were observed for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists. However, more than half of the patients remained on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin-receptor blockers, despite being symptomatic, according to their New York Heart Association class. Most patients (50%) were on triple therapy, as of their most-recent visit, with fewer (36%) on dual therapy, monotherapy (13%), or no GDMT (2%). Our data also suggest that patients who had been managed at the HFC for > 6 months had higher prescription rates of GDMT and were on higher doses of GDMT, compared to those who were new to the clinic. For patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction, few patients were on candesartan and less than half were on a mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist. Conclusions: Our data from HFCs that in most cases were affiliated with academic centres compare favourably with data from other analyses of ambulatory patients with HFrEF, evidence that supports the use of a specialized patient-care model.

Identifiers

PMID39872639
PMCPMC11763239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.