ArticleIn vitro models2022
A 3D-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human neural culture model to study certain molecular and biochemical aspects of Alzheimer's disease.
Article in In vitro models, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling Alzheimer's disease with brain organoids: mechanisms, applications, and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Applications of 3D Bioprinting Technology to Brain Cells and Brain Tumor Models: Special Emphasis to Glioblastoma.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Alzheimer's disease (AD) early pathology needs better understanding and models. Here, we describe a human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)-derived 3D neural culture model to study certain aspects of AD biochemistry and pathology. Method: iPSCs derived from controls and AD patients with Presenilin1 mutations were cultured in a 3D platform with a similar microenvironment to the brain, to differentiate into neurons and astrocytes and self-organise into 3D structures by 3 weeks of differentiation in vitro. Results: Cells express astrocytic (GFAP), neuronal (β3-Tubulin, MAP2), glutamatergic (VGLUT1), GABAergic (GAD65/67), pre-synaptic (Synapsin1) markers and a low level of neural progenitor cell (Nestin) marker after 6 and 12 weeks of differentiation in 3D. The foetal 3R Tau isoforms and adult 4R Tau isoforms were detected at 6 weeks post differentiation, showing advanced neuronal maturity. In the 3D AD cells, total and insoluble Tau levels were higher than in 3D control cells. Conclusion: Our data indicates that this model may recapitulate the early biochemical and pathological disease features and can be a relevant platform for studying early cellular and biochemical changes and the identification of drug targets. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44164-022-00038-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.