ReviewCureus2024
A Scoping Review of Pakistani Healthcare Simulation: Insights for Lower-Middle-Income Countries.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global challenges and perspectives in acute and emergency general surgery in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Study motivations and perceived academic and career returns among international students in clinical medicine education in China: an interview study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Clinical Skill Anxiety and Its Determinants Among Clinical-Year Health Science Students in Ethiopia: An Institutional-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Transfer of Laparoscopic Skills From Box Trainer Simulation to Real Life: A Bi-Center Study in Pakistan.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare simulation has gained global recognition in health professions education, yet its adoption in Pakistan, a lower-middle-income country (LMIC), remains limited. This scoping review aimed to explore how simulation is integrated into healthcare education in Pakistan, highlighting challenges and opportunities to inform similar LMICs. Pakistan serves as a critical case study for LMICs due to its unique challenges, including uneven access to simulation technologies and limited faculty training, which are shared by many similar resource-constrained settings. Using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a systematic review of 693 publications identified 145 studies that met inclusion criteria. The findings revealed diverse simulation modalities primarily focused on skills training and clinical decision-making. Notable innovations included low-cost simulation solutions, effectively addressing resource constraints. However, significant gaps emerged, including an urban-centric focus with limited rural representation, insufficient evaluation of long-term impacts, and the absence of standardized terminology and training protocols. These challenges hinder broader integration and equitable access to simulation-based learning. Addressing these gaps through strategic collaborations, capacity-building initiatives, and innovative, cost-effective solutions, such as low-cost simulators crafted from readily available materials, could enhance simulation adoption in Pakistan and similar LMICs. This review highlights the importance of adopting evidence-based practices, increasing funding, and conducting comprehensive research on simulation's long-term impact to ensure effective implementation and improved healthcare education and outcomes globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.