ArticleCureus2024
Temporal Anomaly Detection in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Using Recurrent Neural Networks.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition marked by movement hyperactivity, often persisting into adulthood. Understanding the movement patterns associated with ADHD is crucial for improving diagnostic precision and tailoring interventions. This study leverages the HYPERAKTIV dataset, which includes high-resolution temporal data on motor activity from people diagnosed with ADHD. We used the isolation forest algorithm to detect anomalies in activity data, followed by the development of a recurrent neural network (RNN) model to predict these anomalies over time. The RNN model demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with a mean accuracy of 0.953 and a mean loss of 0.124 for participants with ADHD. These findings suggest that machine learning techniques, particularly RNNs, can effectively identify and predict anomalies in temporal motor activity data, offering objective insights into ADHD-related movement behaviors. This approach is promising for informing personalized interventions and improving clinical decision-making in the management of ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.