ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
A Unique Simulation Methodology for Practicing Clinical Decision Making.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile bedside teaching offers invaluable clinical experience, its availability is limited. Challenges such as a shortage of clinical placements and qualified teaching physicians, coupled with increasing medical student numbers, exacerbate this issue. Simulation-based learning encompasses varied educational values and has the potential to serve as an important tool in medical students' education.
objectivesIn this study, we evaluate a new Clinical Decision Making Integrated Digital Simulation (CDMIDS) method that was developed in order to enhance the clinical decision-making competency and self-confidence of medical students early in their clinical training through practicing fundamental core skills.
methodsThe study compares 108 4th-year medical students' questionnaire responses pre-/postself-assessments following practice of a new clinical decision-making simulation methodology.
resultsResults indicate a positive participant experience, with the simulation perceived as a valuable platform for practicing integrated bedside decision making. Notably, participants demonstrated a statistically significant increase in willingness to make clinical decisions. The simulation contributed to enhanced knowledge, professional skills, and self-confidence in clinical decision making.
conclusionThe use of a CDMIDS method integrates clinical decision making as part of early medical school curriculum. Moreover, the method boosts learners' professional confidence, self-directed learning, and additional experiences. The method is flexible and can be applied in any medical school, especially those with limited resources, by making specific, localized modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.