Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39872522›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024

DNA vaccines as promising immuno-therapeutics against cancer: a new insight.

Alireza Shariati, Arya Khezrpour, Fatemeh Shariati, Hamed Afkhami, Aref Yarahmadi, Sajad Alavimanesh, Sina Kamrani, Mohammad Hossein Modarressi, Pouria Khani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Medulloblastoma: biology and immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alireza ShariatiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Arya KhezrpourSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh ShariatiDepartment of Genetics, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed AfkhamiCellular and Molecular Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Aref YarahmadiDepartment of Biology, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran.
Sajad AlavimaneshStudent Research Committee, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Sina KamraniDepartment of Orthopedic, Faculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein ModarressiDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Pouria KhaniDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality around the world and most of our conventional treatments are not efficient enough to combat this deadly disease. Harnessing the power of the immune system to target cancer cells is one of the most appealing methods for cancer therapy. Nucleotide-based cancer vaccines, especially deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) cancer vaccines are viable novel cancer treatments that have recently garnered significant attention. DNA cancer vaccines are made of plasmid molecules that encode tumor-associated or tumor-specific antigens (TAAs or TSAs), and possibly some other immunomodulatory adjuvants such as pro-inflammatory interleukins. Following the internalization of plasmids into cells, their genes are expressed and the tumor antigens are loaded on major histocompatibility molecules to be presented to T-cells. After the T-cells have been activated, they will look for tumor antigens and destroy the tumor cells upon encountering them. As with any other treatment, there are pros and cons associated with using these vaccines. They are relatively safe, usually well-tolerated, stable, easily mass-produced, cost-effective, and easily stored and transported. They can induce a systemic immune response effective on both the primary tumor and metastases. The main disadvantage of DNA vaccines is their poor immunogenicity. Several approaches including structural modification, combination therapy with conventional and novel cancer treatments (such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)), and the incorporation of adjuvants into the plasmid structure have been studied to enhance the vaccine's immunogenicity and improve the clinical outcome of cancer patients. In this review, we will discuss some of the most promising optimization strategies and examine some of the important trials regarding these vaccines.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesImmunotherapyNeoplasmsVaccines, DNAAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesVaccines, DNAcancerDNA vaccinesimmune responseimmunotherapyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID39872522
PMCPMC11769820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.