ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Being in a position to know: attuned responsiveness as the hallmark of experiential knowledge and expertise in mental healthcare.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A reply to "Fundamental issues in epistemic injustice in healthcare" by Nielsen, Nordgaard & Henriksen (2025) : Corresponding author.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2026Article
- Understanding Recovery Colleges Through Partaker Narratives: Qualitative Diary-Interview Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- The DSM needs more than revision: five blind spots and a case for dialogical redesign.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- The Design Rationale and Preliminary Evaluation of a Prototype Designed by People With Lived Experience of Psychosis and Professionals: Design Research Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Commentary: Dignity of older persons with mental health conditions: why should clinicians care?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Commentary: Essential elements that contribute to the recovery of persons with severe mental illness: a systematic scoping study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inclusion of people with lived experience into various mental healthcare settings is rapidly increasing. In this article we explicate and address two challenges that hinder this development. First, a descriptive challenge: what is the unique and complementary epistemic contribution of people with lived experience in mental healthcare, precisely? Second, a normative challenge: how to evaluate these contributions of people with lived experience to mental healthcare? To address these challenges, we propose a novel conceptual 'lens' through which to understand the epistemic contributions of people with lived experience. Our approach diverges from the orthodox view by not construing these contributions in terms of (experiential) knowledge, but in terms of perceptual and agential skills which put people with lived experience in a unique 'position to know'. More specifically, we reckon that such contributions are best understood in terms of what we call 'responsiveness' and 'attunement'. The main goal of this paper is to show how the 'Attuned Responsiveness'-Framework allows us to satisfactorily address the descriptive and normative challenge, thereby providing the practice of expertise-by-experience in mental healthcare with a more solid conceptual basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.