ReviewEuropean cardiology2024
Shifting Paradigms in the Management of Pulmonary Hypertension.
Review in European cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating the Complexity of PH-ILD: From Molecular Mechanisms to Integrated Clinical Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical Significance of Echocardiographic Parameters in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Interstitial Lung Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Iron Deficiency in Pulmonary Hypertension-Prevalence, Impact on Prognosis and Disease Burden in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Pulmonary Hypertension Related to Hypoxia: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Echocardiographic Pulmonary-Left Atrial Ratio and Epicardial Adipose Tissue as Noninvasive Markers of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Current Perspectives on Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The trend analysis and comparison of pulmonary arterial hypertension disease burden in China and India from 1990 to 2021: a study based on the Global Burden of Disease 2021 database.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of treprostinil in pediatric pulmonary hypertension following fontan surgery: a real-world analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Sotatercept: A novel therapeutic approach for pulmonary arterial hypertension through transforming growth factor-β signaling modulation.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
- Dynamic and interpretable deep learning model for predicting respiratory failure following cardiac surgery.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Comorbidities' Effect on IPF: Pathogenesis and Management.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Case Report: Shared manifestation, distinct etiologies: severe pulmonary hypertension in both mother and neonate.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Emerging biomaterials and bio-nano interfaces in pulmonary hypertension therapy: transformative strategies for personalized treatment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a long-term condition characterised by increased resistance to blood flow in the pulmonary circulation. The disease has a progressive course and is associated with a poor prognosis. Without treatment, PAH is associated with mortality in <3 years. Over the past decade, many advances have been made in revising the haemodynamic definition, clinical classification, risk calculation score, treatment options etc. Suggestions from the Sixth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension were incorporated into a literature review that was included in the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS)'s most recent iteration of their guidelines in 2022. The traditional cut-off for pulmonary hypertension (PH), i.e., mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >25 mm Hg, has been challenged by observational cohort studies, which have shown poor outcomes for values of 21-24 mmHg; the new consensus is that PH is defined at mPAP >20 mm Hg. Although the gold standard for diagnosis and the major source of therapy guidance continues to be right cardiac catheterisation, echocardiography remains the initial test of choice. A multidisciplinary approach is highly recommended when treating PH patients and careful evaluation of patients will aid in proper diagnosis and prognosis. Pharmacotherapy for PAH has seen a paradigm shift with the successful use of newer agents in more extensive, longer and more inclusive trials driven by hard endpoints. Macitentan, selexipag and riociguat are three oral agents that have shown astounding success in PAH randomised studies in the past decade. Upfront combination therapy with two agents is now becoming the norm (following the AMBITION, OPTIMA and ITALY trials) and the momentum is shifting towards triple therapy as for essential hypertension. More recently, inhaled treprostinil was shown to improve exercise capacity in PH associated with interstitial lung disease in the phase III INCREASE study and has been granted regulatory approval for World Health Organization group 3 PH. A new class of drug, sotatercept (a tumour growth factor-β signalling inhibitor), has also been recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for management of PAH based on positive results from the phase III STELLAR study. Pulmonary artery denervation and balloon pulmonary angioplasty have emerged as viable alternatives in PH that are resistant to drug therapy. This article aims to summarise the key changes and recent advances in diagnosis and managing PH in general, with an emphasis on certain subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.