ReviewCancer pathogenesis and therapy2025
Cancer phylogenetic inference using copy number alterations detected from DNA sequencing data.
Review in Cancer pathogenesis and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell and spatial profiling in cancer biology and clinical oncology.Nature cancer · 2026Review
- Competing subclones and fitness diversity shape tumor evolution across cancer types.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Genome doubling as a dynamic driver of ovarian cancer evolution: insights from single-cell sequencing.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Next-Generation Sequencing: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Connecting scientists and oncologists for advances.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025Article
- Computational strategies in tumor phylogenetics: evaluating multimodal integration and methodological trade-offs across study designs.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is an evolutionary process involving the accumulation of diverse somatic mutations and clonal evolution over time. Phylogenetic inference from samples obtained from an individual patient offers a powerful approach to unraveling the intricate evolutionary history of cancer and provides insights that can inform cancer treatment. Somatic copy number alterations (CNAs) are important in cancer evolution and are often used as markers, alone or with other somatic mutations, for phylogenetic inferences, particularly in low-coverage DNA sequencing data. Many phylogenetic inference methods using CNAs detected from bulk or single-cell DNA sequencing data have been developed over the years. However, there have been no systematic reviews on these methods. To summarize the state-of-the-art of the field and inform future development, this review presents a comprehensive survey on the major challenges in inference, different types of methods, and applications of these methods. The challenges are discussed from the aspects of input data, models of evolution, and inference algorithms. The different methods are grouped according to the markers used for inference and the types of the reconstructed trees. The applications include using phylogenetic inference to understand intra-tumor heterogeneity, metastasis, treatment resistance, and early cancer development. This review also sheds light on future directions of cancer phylogenetic inference using CNAs, including the improvement of scalability, the utilization of new types of data, and the development of more realistic models of evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.