Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39872341›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025

Online patients questions regarding reverse total shoulder arthroplasty pertain to timeline of recovery, specific activities, and limitations.

Kyle K Obana, Dane R G Lind, Andrew J Luzzi, Michaela J O'Connor, Matthew R LeVasseur, William N Levine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kyle K ObanaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Dane R G LindCenter for Regenerative and Personalized Medicine, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Andrew J LuzziDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Michaela J O'ConnorDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Matthew R LeVasseurDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
William N LevineDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) demonstrates favorable long-term data and has outpaced anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty as the most-performed shoulder arthroplasty procedure. As indications and outcomes continue to favor rTSA, patients may turn to the internet as an efficient modality to answer various questions or concerns. This study investigates online patient questions pertaining to rTSA and the quality of the websites providing information. Hypotheses: (1) Questions will pertain to surgical indications, timeline of recovery, and postoperative restrictions; (2) the quality and transparency of online information is largely heterogenous. Methods: Three rTSA searches were entered into the Google Web Search. Questions under the "People also ask" tab were expanded sequentially and 100 consecutive results for each query were included for analysis (300 in total). Questions were categorized based on Rothwell's Classification and subcategorized by topic. Websites were categorized by source. Website quality was evaluated by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria. Results: Most questions fell into the Rothwell Fact category (49.7%). The most common question topics were Timeline of Recovery (17.3%), Specific Activities (14.7%), and Restrictions (11.3%). The least common question topics were Anatomy/Function (0.0%), Cost (0.3%), and Diagnoses/Evaluation (0.3%). The most common websites were Medical Practice (45.0%), Academic (22.3%), and Single Surgeon (12.3%). PubMed articles consisted of 41.2% of Government websites. The average JAMA score for all websites was 1.48 ± 1.27. Government websites had the highest JAMA score (3.11 ± 1.01) and constituted 55.9% of all websites with a score of 4/4. Medical Practice websites had the lowest JAMA score (0.99 ± 0.91). Conclusion: Patients are interested in the timeline of recovery, ability to perform specific activities after surgery, and short-term and long-term restrictions following rTSA. Although all patients will benefit from education on ways to perform activities of daily living while abiding by postoperative restrictions, physicians should set preoperative expectations regarding return-to-activity following rTSA in younger, more active patients. Finally, surgeons should provide patients with physical booklets and online information available on their websites to avoid reliance on low-quality online sources.

Indexed as

GoogleInternetJoint replacementOnlinerTSASurgery

Identifiers

PMID39872341
PMCPMC11764610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.