ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025
How does residency program reputation influence American shoulder and elbow surgeons fellowship match results?
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Success in the Sports Medicine Fellowship Match: The Role of Research Productivity and Academic Metrics.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postresidency training is becoming increasingly common among orthopedic surgeons, with shoulder and elbow surgery growing as a desired subspeciality. There is limited data evaluating how the reputation of an applicants' orthopedic residency influences the outcome of the shoulder and elbow fellowship match. The purpose of this study was to determine if applicants from residencies with better reputation have more favorable odds during the match process compared to applicants from residencies with a less prestigious reputation. Methods: Residency reputation was determined using the 2023 Doximity residency ranking. These residency programs were then divided into 5 tiers (with tier 1 being the highest ranked and tier 5 being the lowest). Fellowship match data was obtained via San Francisco match from 2016 to 2023. Unmatched applicants, international graduates, and applicants without residency information were excluded. Applicants from 2016 to 2017 were excluded due to incomplete match data. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, analysis of variance, and nonparametric analysis. Results: There was a statistically significant difference with residency tier and average matched rank by fellowship program ( Conclusion: Applicants from higher tier residencies are more likely to be ranked higher by shoulder and elbow fellowship programs compared to applicants from lower-tier residencies. Tiers 1, 2, and 3 are ranked approximately equally, while tiers 4 and 5 are ranked significantly lower. There was no association noted between residency tier and applicant match rank; however, applicants from higher-tier residencies were far more likely to match at their top fellowship programs compared to applicants from lower-tier residencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.