Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39872331›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2025

Medialization of shaft of humerus to provide medial buttress and prevent varus collapse in 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: review of the surgical technique.

Srinivas Kasha, Ranjith Kumar Yalamanchili, G P R K Rohit, Suresh Krishna Lokayah, Varun Kulkarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Positive cortical support reduction in treatment of trochanteric femur fractures: history in theory establishment and its inspiration for clinical innovations].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Srinivas KashaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, Telanagana, India.
Ranjith Kumar YalamanchiliAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Telangana, India.
G P R K RohitDepartment of Orthopaedics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, Telanagana, India.
Suresh Krishna LokayahDepartment of Orthopaedics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, Telanagana, India.
Varun KulkarniDepartment of Orthopaedics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, Telanagana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypothesis: Proximal humerus fractures present a treatment challenge due to varied fracture configurations and a lack of consensus on optimal management. Locking plate designs offer promising solutions, yet technical guidelines for successful outcomes remain elusive. Complications are common, with fixation-related failures often attributed to varus collapse. Addressing this, we review a novel intraoperative technique of medialization of the humerus shaft to provide medial buttress support to the humerus head. Methods: This retrospective study included acute 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures treated with open reduction and proximal humerus locking plate fixation from February 2013 to August 2021, which were restored by creating medial buttress by the described technique. Central Column Diaphyseal angle was measured on the 20° external rotation anteroposterior X-ray radiograph, by measuring the intersection angle of the axis of the proximal part of the humerus and the line perpendicular to the anatomical neck. The functional outcome was measured with the Constant score that assesses pain and shoulder function during daily activities, range of motion, and shoulder strength at each follow-up. Results: Seventy-six patients with acute 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures were treated using this technique and followed for an average of 16 months. Results showed successful union in 76% of cases within 12 weeks, with no nonunions or implant failures requiring revision surgery at a minimum of 24 months follow-up. Functional outcomes were favorable in 70% of patients. However, avascular necrosis of the humeral head occurred in 12% of cases. Conclusion: Despite limitations, this technique offers a biomechanically sound approach to enhance fixation stability, potentially improving the outcomes in proximal humerus fractures without the need for any additional fibular grafting procedures.

Indexed as

Avoid varus collapse with PHILOSMedial buttress in proximal humerusMedialization of shaft of humerus techniqueMedialization of shaft to prevent varus collapseMedial support for proximal humerus by shaft humerusVarus collapse in proximal humerus

Identifiers

PMID39872331
PMCPMC11764120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.