ArticleIndian journal of nephrology
Detections of Chemicals and Migratory Plastics in Peritoneal Dialysis Fluids.
Article in Indian journal of nephrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Peritonitis and ultrafiltration failure are complications that have a long-term impact on PD patients. Besides touch contamination, procedural errors and clinical reasons of peritonitis, contaminants, and constituents of peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) have been implicated in causing peritonitis and ultrafiltration failure. This study was aimed to test the PDFs in India for the presence of migratory plastics. Materials and Methods: PDFs from the two manufacturers in India were tested using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) with headspace analysis (volatile compounds) and pyrolysis of plastics (polymer compounds). The storage conditions and handling were uniform. Results: The results revealed impurities of acetate compounds and aldehyde derivatives of glucose degradation products (GDPs) with contaminants and leachable plastics. There were high levels of GDP derivative in the form of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural compounds (5-HMF). The analysis revealed the presence of plastic softeners in very high concentrations. Conclusion: The study unmasks the presence of chemicals and GDPs that can be implicated in pathogenesis of sterile peritonitis and ultrafiltration failure. The study demonstrated the presence of leachable plastics. In conclusion, LCMS and GCMS studies can be used to test PDFs for unwanted chemicals prior to human use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.