Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39872241›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2024

Support in digital health skill development for vulnerable groups in a public library setting: perspectives of trainers.

Lucille M B Standaar, Adriana M C Israel, Rosalie van der Vaart, Brigitta Keij, Roland D Friele, Mariëlle A Beenackers, L H D van Tuyl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucille M B StandaarDepartment of Population Health and Health Services Research, Centre for Public Health, Healthcare and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Adriana M C IsraelDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Rosalie van der VaartResearch Group Technology for Healthcare, Centre of Expertise Health Innovation, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, Netherlands.
Brigitta KeijDepartment of Population Health and Health Services Research, Centre for Public Health, Healthcare and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Roland D FrieleDepartment Organisation and Quality of Care, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Mariëlle A BeenackersDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
L H D van TuylDepartment Organisation and Quality of Care, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The digitalization of healthcare poses a risk of exacerbating health inequalities. Dutch public libraries offer freely accessible e-health courses given by trainers. However, there is limited knowledge on whether these libraries successfully reach and support those in need. This study aimed to explore trainers' perspectives on the challenges, successes, and potential improvements in digital health skill education in a library setting. Materials and methods: Trainers of the e-health course were interviewed. Topics included: the role of the library in digital health skills education, the successes and challenges in reaching groups with a low socioeconomic position, the perceived impact of the digital health skills education, and strategies for future improvement in digital health skills education. A deductive analysis based upon the interview guide topics was performed. A second inductive analysis was applied to identify underlying patterns. Coding was done independently and cross-checked. Codebooks and themes were determined in discussion with authors. Results: Three themes emerged. 1) Trainers' services, skills and expertise: Trainers identified older adults, youth, people with low (digital) literacy, the unemployed, and people from non-native cultural backgrounds as the groups most in need of support. Trainers felt equipped to address these groups' needs. 2) The libraries' reach: improving engagement, perceived accessibility, and clients' barriers: Despite trainers' efforts to adjust the course to the target groups' level of commitment, digital and literacy levels, and logistics, the digital health course predominantly engages older adults. Experienced barriers in reach: limited perceived accessibility of the public library and clients' personal barriers. 3) Collaborations with healthcare, welfare and community organizations: Trainers emphasized that collaborations could enhance the diversity and number of participants. Current partnerships provided: reach to target groups, teaching locations, and referral of clients. Discussion: Trainers in public libraries recognize a various target groups that need support in digital health skill development. The study identified three challenges: accessibility of the digital health course, reach of the public library, and clients' personal barriers. Public libraries have potential to support their target groups but need strategies to improve their engagement and reach. Collaborations with healthcare, welfare, and community organizations are essential to improve their reach to those most in need of support.

Indexed as

digital dividedigital healthhealth educationhealth literacyolder adultssocial servicessocio-economic factorsvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID39872241
PMCPMC11770011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.