ArticleIn vitro models2022
In situ 3D spatiotemporal measurement of soluble biomarkers in spheroid culture.
Article in In vitro models, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding wound healing: cellular insights and technological advances.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Bioconjugated Liquid-Like Solid (LLS) Enhance Characterization of Solid Tumor - Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell interactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Advanced cell culture techniques such as 3D bioprinting and hydrogel-based cell embedding techniques harbor many new and exciting opportunities to study cells in environments that closely recapitulate in vivo conditions. Researchers often study these environments using fluorescence microscopy to visualize the protein association with objects such as cells within the 3D environment, yet quantification of concentration profiles in the microenvironment has remained elusive. Objective: Demonstrate an assay that enables near real-time in situ biomarker detection and spatiotemporal quantification of biomarker concentration in 3D cell culture. Methods: A distributed bead-based immuno-assay was used in 3D cell culture to continuously measure the time-dependent concentration gradient of various biomarkers by sequestering soluble target molecules and concentrating the fluorescence intensity of these tagged proteins. Timelapse confocal microscopy was used to measure the in situ fluorescence intensity profile and a calibration curve was separately generated. Application of a calibration transfer function to in situ data is used to quantify spatiotemporal concentration. Results: Example assays utilize an osteosarcoma spheroid as a case study for a quantitative single-plexed gel encapsulated assay, and a qualitative multi-plexed 3D-bioprinted assay. In both cases, a time-varying cytokine concentration gradient is measured. An estimation for the production rate of the IL-8 cytokine per second per osteosarcoma cell results from fitting an analytical function for continuous point source diffusion to the measured concentration gradient and reveals that spheroid production approaches nearly 0.18 fg/s of IL-8 after 18 h in culture. Conclusions: Theoretical and experimental demonstration of bead-based immunoassays in diffusion-limited environments such as 3D cell culture is shown, and includes example measurements of various cytokines produced by an osteosarcoma spheroid. Proper calibration and use of this assay is exhaustively explored for the case of diffusion-limited Langmuir kinetics of a spherical adsorber.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.