Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39872114›Full record

ArticleLife medicine2023

Restoring carboxypeptidase E rescues BDNF maturation and neurogenesis in aged brains.

Hongmei Liu, Dongfang Jiang, Fuwen Yao, Tingting Li, Bo Zhou, Song Zhao, Keyan Yang, Haiping Feng, Jiaqi Shen, Jinglan Tang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hongmei LiuState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Dongfang JiangState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Fuwen YaoBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences/China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Tingting LiState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Bo ZhouBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences/China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Song ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Keyan YangState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Haiping FengState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Jiaqi ShenState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Jinglan TangState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Sijia WangState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yu-Xin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yun WangState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Qian LiBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences/China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Yongliang ZhaoBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences/China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Caixia GuoBeijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences/China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2820-705X
Tie-Shan TangState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult neurogenesis declines with age due to the less functional neural stem cells (NSCs) and niches, but the underlying molecular bases for this impaired condition remain unclear. Here we analyzed >55,000 single-cell transcriptomes from two discrete neurogenic niches across the mouse lifespan, and identified new features and populations in NSCs, new markers, and neurogenic regional-specific alternations during aging. Intercellular communication analysis revealed defects in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-TrkB signaling cascade in old NSCs. Carboxypeptidase E (CPE) was found to be highly enriched in NSCs, and played a crucial role in mature/proBDNF balance and adult neurogenesis. Diminishment of CPE with aging resulted in impaired generation of BDNF, thus limiting the neurogenesis in old neurogenic niches. Restoring CPE expression markedly rescued the adult neurogenesis by increasing the production of mature BDNF, offering an attractive therapeutic strategy for the treatment of certain disorders in regions associated with constitutive neurogenesis.

Indexed as

adult neurogenesisagingBDNFcarboxypeptidase E

Identifiers

PMID39872114
PMCPMC11749474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.