ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Establishing an Electrophysiological Recording Platform for Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain Rats.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is pivotal in treating chronic intractable pain. To elucidate the mechanism of action among conventional and current novel types of SCSs, a stable and reliable electrophysiology model in the consensus animals to mimic human SCS treatment is essential. We have recently developed a new in vivo implantable pulsed-ultrahigh-frequency (pUHF) SCS platform for conducting behavioral and electrophysiological studies in rats. However, some technical details were not fully understood. This study comprehensively analyzed methodology and technical challenges and pitfalls encountered during the development and implementation of this model. Materials and Methods: Employing a newly developed pUHF-SCS (±3 V, 2 Hz pulses with 500-kHz biphasic radiofrequency sinewaves), we assessed analgesic effect and changes of evoked local field potentials (eLFPs) in the bilateral primary somatosensory and anterior cingulate cortices in the rats with or without spared nerve injury (SNI) using the platform. The placement of stimulating needle electrodes in the hind paw was examined and optimized for functionality. Results: SNI enhanced the C component of eLFPs in bilateral cortexes elicited by stimulating the contralateral but not the ipsilateral lateral aspect of the hind paw. Repeated pUHF-SCS significantly reversed SNI-induced paw hypersensitivity and reduced C-component enhancement. An impedance test can determine an optimal SCS electrode function: an SCS discharge threshold of 100-400 μA for cortical activation or a motor threshold of 150-600 μA for the hind limbs. Impedance increased due to growth of fibrotic tissue but stabilized after post-implantation day 12. Conclusion: We presented a reliable electrophysiological platform for SCS application in rat neuropathic pain model and demonstrated potent analgesic effects of pUHF-SCS. All device implantations or pUHF-SCS per se did not cause evident spinal cord damage. This safe and stable platform provides an in vivo rat model for SCS investigation of mechanisms of action and device innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.