ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Use of Magnetic Resonance Neurography for Sensory Nerve Injuries of the Head and Neck.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Identification of peripheral nerve injuries of the head and neck can be challenging due to a broad spectrum of symptoms from neuropathic pain to headaches and migraine. This article aimed to present the clinical features and diagnostic workup of patients with acute and chronic peripheral nerve injuries of the head and neck using magnetic resonance neurography (MRN), to demonstrate potential advantages compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Patients who presented with suspected peripheral nerve injury were either referred for a conventional MRI or MRN. Patients who underwent nerve exploration for suspected nerve transection and/or neuroma formation on imaging were included in this study. Imaging findings were correlated with intraoperative observations. Results: Four patients (3 women, 1 man, age range: 34-70 years) were included. Three subjects had a history of head and neck surgery and 1 experienced direct trauma to the medial eyebrow. Clinical symptoms included numbness, allodynia, positive Tinel sign, and pain relief following nerve blocks. Two patients underwent conventional MRI and 2 underwent MRN. MRI provided a vague indication of potential neuromas and failed to accurately depict their locations. MRN offered a comprehensive visualization of the entire nerve path, identifying nerve transection and neuromas, as well as precise location, dimensions, and relation to adjacent bones and muscles. Conclusions: High-resolution 3-dimensional MRN provides clear visualization of acute and chronic peripheral nerve injuries of the head and neck region, facilitating early diagnosis of nerve injuries in this region and improving diagnostic accuracy, as well as surgical planning and execution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.