Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39872067›Full record

ReviewIn vitro models2024

Impact of mechanical engineering innovations in biomedical advancements.

Senthil Maharaj Kennedy, A Vasanthanathan, R B Jeen Robert, A Vignesh Moorthi Pandian

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in In vitro models, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Senthil Maharaj KennedyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, AAA College of Engineering and Technology, Sivakasi, 626005 India.ORCID 0000-0003-4932-0403
A VasanthanathanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi, 626005 India.
R B Jeen RobertDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Krishna College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641042 India.
A Vignesh Moorthi PandianDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, AAA College of Engineering and Technology, Sivakasi, 626005 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: The principal objective of the present paper is to meticulously review the family of biomaterials used in implants. A spectrum of applications of biomaterials in the perspective of prosthesis is also presented. This paper also emphasises on the review of the recent advancements in the field of biomedical implants with respect to mechanical engineering perspective. The latest technologies such as finite element modelling of prosthetic implants, additive manufacturing of implants and certain experimental methods adopted in the field of prosthesis are discussed. Moreover, various models were modelled using SOLIDWORKS® 2022 modelling software and analysed using ANSYS® 2021 R2 finite element analysing software and implant models were additive manufactured to make this review more interesting and for better understanding. Overall, the latest technology in the field of mechanical engineering that fuels its impact in life-saving biomedical engineering has been discussed briefly. Graphical abstract:

Indexed as

Additive manufacturingBiomaterialBiomedical devicesFinite element methodImplantsProsthesis

Identifiers

PMID39872067
PMCPMC11756506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.