ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Tibiotalocalcaneal nailing as a treatment for ankle fractures in the elderly population: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Formal joint preparation appears to not be necessary for surgical treatment of ankle fractures with tibiotalocalcaneal nailing: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated patient outcomes of tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing for ankle fractures in an elderly population. A systematic literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar identified 24 studies involving 657 patients aged over 65. Key outcome measures included union rates, healing time, functional scores, and complications. The average union rate for TTC nail patients was 88.36 % (±12 %), with a healing time of 17.8 weeks (±4.68). Post-operatively, 77.16 % (±17 %) of patients returned to or exceeded their baseline ambulatory function. Pre-injury Olerud-Molander Ankle Scores averaged 63.1 (±5.00), compared to 50.43 (±8.59) post-surgery. Infection rates were reported in 10.51 % (±0.07) of patients (60/571), with superficial and deep infection rates of 6.83 % (±8 %) and 3.68 % (±6 %), respectively. Nail failure occurred in 4.7 % (12/255) of cases, and the average revision rate was 13.36 % (±7 %). In conclusion, TTC nailing is a viable treatment for elderly patients with ankle fractures. It offers satisfactory functional outcomes and an acceptable complication risk. It is particularly beneficial for those unable to undergo multiple surgeries or with significant comorbidities, providing a quick and effective means to restore mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.