ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Improving prenatal diagnosis with combined karyotyping, CNV-seq and QF-PCR: a comprehensive analysis of chromosomal abnormalities in high-risk pregnancies.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complementary Diagnostic Roles of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing, Chromosomal Microarray Analysis, and Karyotyping in 14,011 High-Risk Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Combined Analyses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Decoding Genetic Risk Factors in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: An Integrative Chromosomal and Bioinformatics Approach.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- A rareArchive of clinical cases · 2026Article
- Screening of triploid in miscarriage tissues using medium-coverage whole genome sequencing with a three-algorithm integrated approach.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the diagnostic efficacy of a combined approach integrating chromosomal karyotyping, copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq), and quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) in detecting chromosomal abnormalities in high-risk pregnancies. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 617 high-risk pregnancies undergoing prenatal diagnosis from February 2023 to August 2024, with amniotic fluid samples concurrently analyzed using karyotyping, CNV-seq, and QF-PCR. We evaluated clinical characteristics, diagnostic yields, and inter-method concordance rates. Longitudinal follow-up assessed pregnancy outcomes and neonatal phenotypes, with particular emphasis on cases demonstrating diagnostic discrepancies or variants of uncertain clinical significance. Results: The integrated approach detected chromosomal abnormalities in 12.5% (77/617) of cases, significantly higher than the rates achieved by karyotyping alone (9.7%) and CNV-seq/QF-PCR alone (8.3%) ( Conclusion: The integration of karyotyping, CNV-seq, and QF-PCR provides superior diagnostic yield compared to individual testing strategies in high-risk pregnancies. Although karyotyping remains the gold standard for detecting major chromosomal aberrations, CNV-seq and QF-PCR enhance diagnostic precision through detection of submicroscopic variations. Multi-center studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings and clarify the clinical significance of uncertain variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.