ReviewIn vitro models2023
Microfluidics engineering towards personalized oncology-a review.
Review in In vitro models, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An integrated microfluidic system for automatic and self-validated analysis of cervical extracellular vesicle markers PD-L1 and ERBB3.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying and monitoring the presence of cancer metastasis and highlighting inter-and intratumoral heterogeneity is a central tenet of targeted precision oncology medicine (POM). This process of relocation of cancer cells is often referred to as the missing link between a tumor and metastasis. In recent years, microfluidic technologies have been developed to isolate a plethora of different biomarkers, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor-derived vesicles (exosomes), or cell/free nucleic acids and proteins directly from patients' blood samples. With the advent of microfluidic developments, minimally invasive and quantitative assessment of different tumors is becoming a reality. This short review article will touch briefly on how microfluidics at early-stage achievements can be combined or developed with the active vs passive microfluidic technologies, depending on whether they utilize external fields and forces (active) or just microchannel geometry and inherent fluid forces (passive) from the market to precision oncology research and our future prospectives in terms of the emergence of ultralow cost and rapid prototyping of microfluidics in precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.