ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
A deep learning model for carotid plaques detection based on CTA images: a two stepwise early-stage clinical validation study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence diagnostic performance in image-based vulnerable carotid plaque detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Deep Learning-Assisted Three-Dimensional Segmentation of Vertebrobasilar Artery Calcification in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Accuracy of deep learning in the detection of carotid calcifications on cone-beam computed tomography: A systematic review.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in carotid computed tomography angiography plaque detection: Decade of progress and future perspectives.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Retrospective study on the association between carotid plaque stability assessed by ultrasound imaging features and stroke risk.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a deep learning (DL) model for carotid plaque detection based on CTA images and evaluate the clinical application feasibility and value of the model. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaques who underwent continuous CTA examinations of the head and neck at a tertiary hospital from October 2020 to October 2022. The model combined ResUNet with the Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet) to enhance plaque segmentation. Patient plaques were divided into training, validation, and testing sets in a ratio of 7:1.5:1.5. We analyzed recall (lesion-level sensitivity), sensitivity (patient-level), and precision to evaluate the model's diagnostic performance for carotid plaques. The two stepwise early-stage clinical validation study (Comparison study and Model-human study) was used to simulate real clinical plaque diagnostic scenarios. Results: In total, 647 patients were included in the dataset, including 475 for training, 86 for validation, and 86 for testing. The DL model based on CTA images showed good precision in plaque diagnosis (validation set: precision = 80.49%, sensitivity = 90.70%, recall = 84.62%; test set: precision = 78.37%, sensitivity = 91.86%, recall = 84.58%). In addition, subgroup analysis of the plaque was carried out in the test set. The model had high accuracy in identifying plaques at different locations (Recall: 83.72, 76.32, 89.25, and 83.02%) and with different morphologies (Recall: 86.03, 79.17%). This model also analyzed the results of different types of plaques and showed good to moderate plaque diagnostic accuracy for different plaque types (Recall: 70.00, 86.87, 84.29%). Especially, in the clinical application scenario analysis, the model's diagnostic results for plaques were found to be higher than those of 4 out of 6 radiologists ( Conclusion: This AI model demonstrated strong clinical potential for carotid plaque detection with improved clinician diagnostic performance, shortening time, and practical implementation in real-world clinical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.