Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39871993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

A deep learning model for carotid plaques detection based on CTA images: a two stepwise early-stage clinical validation study.

Zhongping Guo, Ying Liu, Jingxu Xu, Chencui Huang, Fandong Zhang, Chongchang Miao, Yonggang Zhang, Mengshuang Li, Hangsheng Shan, Yan Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhongping Guo *Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, China.
Ying Liu *Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, China.
Jingxu XuDepartment of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Chencui HuangDepartment of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of PHD Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Fandong ZhangDeepwise Artificial Intelligence (AI) Lab, Deepwise, Beijing, China.
Chongchang MiaoDepartment of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, China.
Yonggang ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, China.
Mengshuang LiDepartment of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, China.
Hangsheng ShanDepartment of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, China.
Yan GuDepartment of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a deep learning (DL) model for carotid plaque detection based on CTA images and evaluate the clinical application feasibility and value of the model. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaques who underwent continuous CTA examinations of the head and neck at a tertiary hospital from October 2020 to October 2022. The model combined ResUNet with the Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet) to enhance plaque segmentation. Patient plaques were divided into training, validation, and testing sets in a ratio of 7:1.5:1.5. We analyzed recall (lesion-level sensitivity), sensitivity (patient-level), and precision to evaluate the model's diagnostic performance for carotid plaques. The two stepwise early-stage clinical validation study (Comparison study and Model-human study) was used to simulate real clinical plaque diagnostic scenarios. Results: In total, 647 patients were included in the dataset, including 475 for training, 86 for validation, and 86 for testing. The DL model based on CTA images showed good precision in plaque diagnosis (validation set: precision = 80.49%, sensitivity = 90.70%, recall = 84.62%; test set: precision = 78.37%, sensitivity = 91.86%, recall = 84.58%). In addition, subgroup analysis of the plaque was carried out in the test set. The model had high accuracy in identifying plaques at different locations (Recall: 83.72, 76.32, 89.25, and 83.02%) and with different morphologies (Recall: 86.03, 79.17%). This model also analyzed the results of different types of plaques and showed good to moderate plaque diagnostic accuracy for different plaque types (Recall: 70.00, 86.87, 84.29%). Especially, in the clinical application scenario analysis, the model's diagnostic results for plaques were found to be higher than those of 4 out of 6 radiologists ( Conclusion: This AI model demonstrated strong clinical potential for carotid plaque detection with improved clinician diagnostic performance, shortening time, and practical implementation in real-world clinical cases.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecarotid plaquecomputed tomography angiographydeep learninghead and neck

Identifiers

PMID39871993
PMCPMC11769795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.