Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39871983›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

A review on arsenic contamination in drinking water: sources, health impacts, and remediation approaches.

Bashdar Abuzed Sadee, Salih M S Zebari, Yaseen Galali, Mahmood Fadhil Saleem

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. BiOBr nanoparticle-modified TiRSC advances · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bashdar Abuzed SadeeDepartment of Food Technology, College of Agriculture Engineering Sciences, Salahaddin University-Erbil Erbil Kurdistan Region Iraq bashdar.sadee@su.edu.krd.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7588-7388
Salih M S ZebariDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Cihan University-Erbil Erbil Iraq.
Yaseen GalaliDepartment of Food Technology, College of Agriculture Engineering Sciences, Salahaddin University-Erbil Erbil Kurdistan Region Iraq bashdar.sadee@su.edu.krd.
Mahmood Fadhil SaleemDepartment of Food Technology, College of Agriculture Engineering Sciences, Salahaddin University-Erbil Erbil Kurdistan Region Iraq bashdar.sadee@su.edu.krd.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arsenic (As) contamination in groundwater has become a global concern, and it poses a serious threat to the health of millions of people. Groundwater with high As concentrations has been reported worldwide. It is widely recognized that the toxicity of As largely depends on its chemical forms, making As speciation a critical issue. Numerous studies on As speciation have been conducted, extending beyond the general knowledge on As to the toxicity and health issues caused by exposure to various As species in water. This article reviews various As species, their sources and health effects, and treatment methods for the removal of As from contaminated water. Additionally, various established and emerging technologies for the removal of As contaminants from the environment, including adsorption (using rocks, soils, minerals, industrial by-products, biosorbents, biochars, and microalgal and fungal biomass), ion exchange, phytoremediation, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, and membrane technologies, are discussed. Treating As-contaminated drinking water is considered the most effective approach to minimize the associated health risks. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of various remediation and removal methods are outlined, along with their key advantages. Among these techniques, the simplicity, low cost, and ease of operation make adsorption techniques desirable, particularly with the use of novel functional materials like graphite oxides, metal-organic frameworks, carbon nanotubes, and other emerging functional materials, which are promising future alternatives for As removal.

Identifiers

PMID39871983
PMCPMC11770421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.