ReviewRSC advances2025
A review on arsenic contamination in drinking water: sources, health impacts, and remediation approaches.
Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- OsELP Mediated Apoplastic Sequestration in Roots Acts as an Arsenic Filter, Limiting Grain Accumulation in Rice.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Article
- Mechanistic insights into As(III) removal from groundwater using iron net-based zero-valent iron: reaction pathways and inhibitory effects of phosphorus and silicon.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Insulin-Urothelial Axis: Evaluating Insulin Resistance as a Convergent Driver of Bladder Cancer Across Diverse Risk Factor Profiles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Chitosan-Based Adsorbents: A Versatile Platform for the Removal of Arsenate and Copper Ions from Water.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Green synthesis of Mohr's salt-modified keratin composite for selective removal of arsenate from polluted water.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- One-pot-synthesized anthracene-based chemodosimeter for toxic cyanide (CNRSC advances · 2026Article
- Design and implementation of an open-access arsenic biosensor.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Environmental pollutants and the gut microbiota: mechanistic links from exposure to systemic disease.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Essential and Toxic Elements in Cardiovascular Disease: Pathophysiological Roles and the Emerging Contribution of Hair Mineral Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Adsorptive Removal of Arsenite and Cobalt by Commercial Sorbents.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From Batch to Pilot: Scaling Up Arsenic Removal with an Fe-Mn-Based Nanocomposite.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Speciation and Thermodynamic Study of Arsenic(III)-Pharmaceutical Complexes in Aqueous Solutions.ACS environmental Au · 2025Article
- BiOBr nanoparticle-modified TiRSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arsenic (As) contamination in groundwater has become a global concern, and it poses a serious threat to the health of millions of people. Groundwater with high As concentrations has been reported worldwide. It is widely recognized that the toxicity of As largely depends on its chemical forms, making As speciation a critical issue. Numerous studies on As speciation have been conducted, extending beyond the general knowledge on As to the toxicity and health issues caused by exposure to various As species in water. This article reviews various As species, their sources and health effects, and treatment methods for the removal of As from contaminated water. Additionally, various established and emerging technologies for the removal of As contaminants from the environment, including adsorption (using rocks, soils, minerals, industrial by-products, biosorbents, biochars, and microalgal and fungal biomass), ion exchange, phytoremediation, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, and membrane technologies, are discussed. Treating As-contaminated drinking water is considered the most effective approach to minimize the associated health risks. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of various remediation and removal methods are outlined, along with their key advantages. Among these techniques, the simplicity, low cost, and ease of operation make adsorption techniques desirable, particularly with the use of novel functional materials like graphite oxides, metal-organic frameworks, carbon nanotubes, and other emerging functional materials, which are promising future alternatives for As removal.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.