ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Understanding trends in osteoporosis drug prescribing: implications for reducing futile biomedical research.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoporosis is a significant geriatric condition, considering its impact on fracture-related morbidity and mortality, particularly among older women. The interplay of clinical evidence, diagnostic tools availability, and broader societal attitudes toward aging and treatment efficacy affect medical attitude and prescribing behaviors. Using the example of osteoporosis in France and England, the study aims to unravel the intricacies of medical decision-making in geriatric care, offering insights into the evolving landscape of healthcare policy and practice, which in turn can help reduce futile biomedical research. Methods: We employed documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews. Documentary analysis involved examining public policy documents related to osteoporosis management in England and France to identify trends in regulatory policies influencing prescribing practices. Semi-structured interviews with physicians explored prescriber decision-making processes, treatment initiation, and compliance management, providing insights into clinical practice complexities. Results: The policy analysis uncovered 157 documents between 2015 and 2016, updated in 2018, revealing distinct policy clusters and outliers shaping osteoporosis management in England and France. Therapeutic indications generally mirrored marketing authorizations. Reimbursable therapeutic indications in France showed fluctuating availability, reflecting changes in policy priorities and patient demographics. Clinical guidelines evolved to encompass diverse osteoporosis types and treatment options, guided by evidence-based recommendations and healthcare system considerations. Trust dynamics between physicians, pharmaceutical companies, and health authorities influenced prescribing trends, with variations in reliance on standardized protocols and collaborative decision-making observed between England and France. Discussion: Understanding trends in osteoporosis drug prescribing is crucial for optimizing healthcare policy and practice. Our study highlights the complex factors influencing prescribing patterns in England and France, emphasizing the role of trust in shaping physician behaviors. By addressing barriers to treatment uptake and enhancing patient outcomes, targeted interventions can be developed to reduce futile biomedical research and improve healthcare resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.