SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
[
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in distant metastasis staging of non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Reimagining Nodal Staging in Colorectal Cancer: Toward a Novel Non-Invasive Imaging Approach.Cancers · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics for Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development and validation of an MRI-based clinical-radiomics nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This meta-analysis aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of [ Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted throughout the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for works accessible through September 2024. We included studies assessed the diagnostic efficacy of [ Results: The meta-analysis includes six studies with a total of 437 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of [ Conclusion: Our meta-analysis shows that [ Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023479817, CRD42023479817.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.