ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Prognostic value of atherogenic index of plasma in pulmonary hypertension.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is a brand-new lipid parameter that has been used to assess various cardiovascular events. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of AIP in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine affiliated Renji Hospital, and included data from 125 PH patients treated during 2014-2018. The endpoint events of this study were clinical worsening outcomes. PH patients include those from group 1 and group 4. AIP was determined as the logarithm of the blood triglycerides ratio to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Results: The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year incidence rates of clinical worsening outcomes in PH patients in this study were 20.0, 44.8, and 54.4%, respectively. The median age of the PH patients was 38.00 years, with females accounting for 90.4%. After controlling for multivariable factors, the results of Cox regression analysis indicated that AIP was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes with a hazard ratio and 95% confident interval (CI) of 2.426 (1.021-5.763). The positive linear relationship of AIP was evaluated using restricted cubic spline analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significantly higher events rate in patients with AIP ≥ 0.144 compared to those with AIP < 0.144 ( Conclusion: AIP is an independent predictor of long-term clinical worsening in PH patients, and its inclusion in prognostic models could improve risk stratification and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.