ArticleCurrent eye research2025
Research Best Practices for Eye Stroke Vision Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Current eye research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCentral retinal artery occlusion, also known as an eye stroke, results in visual impairment and functional challenges. Our study objectives were to identify meaningful measures and factors that indicate or enable successful recovery after eye stroke and to determine optimal processes to support research, including exploring barriers and facilitators to successful research participation.
methodsWe used qualitative methods including the 5Ts Framework (target population identification, team composition, time considerations, tips to accommodate older adults, tools for inclusive enrollment of older adults) to provide a guide to the development of the semi-structured interviews and to help facilitate the research process such as the set-up of interviews. We enrolled three groups: individuals living with the sequelae of eye stroke, care partners, and health care providers. We conducted a descriptive content analysis with an inductive approach.
resultsTwenty-five people participated. This group included 10 eye stroke survivors (median age, 62.5; range, 56-84 years; 20% were women), 4 care partners (median age, 57 years; range, 56-59 years; 100% were women), and 11 health care providers (median age, 33 years; 25-60 years; 54.5% were women). Four themes emerged from the data: (1) returning to full independence, (2) family support, (3) strategies for participation, and (4) lack of accessibility.
conclusionsThe themes identified by participant groups indicated that strategies such as providing sufficient lighting and incorporating family support are key for research participation by individuals with vision impairment related to eye stroke. Furthermore, it is essential that researchers determine ways to address inequities, including lack of accessibility to research sites. This work has implications for how research teams develop research processes and implement research findings into clinical settings for eye stroke survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.