ArticleChild: care, health and development2025
Improving Parent and Therapist Experiences of Codelivering Intensive Upper Limb Interventions for Children With Hemiplegia: A Qualitative Study Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Article in Child: care, health and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Partnership delivery of evidence-based therapy intervention to improve upper-limb function: a retrospective analysis.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude and practice of rehabilitation management of the caregivers of pediatric patients with hemiplegia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPartnership working between parents and therapists is a key component of family-centred care (FCC). Such partnerships in paediatric intervention delivery can help achieve required levels of dosage, intensity and embed interventions in the child's everyday activities. This study explores the experience and views of parents and therapists codelivering an intensive upper limb intervention programme for children with hemiplegia, to find ways to enhance successful partnership working.
methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 12 parents and 8 therapists (3 hospital-based and 5 community-based). To help make evidence-based recommendations, data were analysed using inductive reflexive analysis and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) of constructs that are common determinants of clinical behaviours or practices.
resultsFive major themes were identified as follows: (1) realities of accessing intensive intervention, (2) key components of intervention delivery, (3) role of goal setting, (4) importance of partnership and (5) impact of intervention delivery on parents. Our findings showed that overall parents valued involvement in the programme, acknowledging benefits and challenges, as well as aspects in which they needed further support. Hospital therapists identified various education and training needs to improve their capabilities to coach parents and to collaboratively set meaningful goals. Community therapists valued the opportunity to develop their skills in intensive intervention and were keen to see evidence-based interventions offered in the community.
conclusionsIt is possible for parents, hospital therapists and community therapists to codeliver intensive upper limb intervention programmes to children with hemiplegia. However, it is important to create a flexible programme which clearly acknowledges the roles, skills and unique contributions of parents and therapists which is conducive to truly equal partnership working in appropriate settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.