ReviewClinical cardiology2025
Advancements in Artificial Intelligence in Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Clinical cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Diagnostic and Prognostic Impact of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Advancements in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence, extended reality and computational modelling in cross-sectional cardiovascular imaging in congenital heart disease: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Giant Step in Personalized Medicine?Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Multimodal diagnostic imaging for early mitral valve disease: integration of current and emerging modalities-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
- Applying artificial intelligence to cardiac MRI to diagnose congenital heart disease in low-resource settings such as Sub-Saharan Africa.Communications medicine · 2025Review
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025Review
- Advanced Computer Simulation Based on Cardiac Imaging in Planning of Structural Heart Disease Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cardiac Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Myocardial Bridging: A Scoping Review of the Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Health: Insights into Post-COVID Public Health Challenges.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2025Review
- Longitudinal Myocardial Deformation as an Emerging Biomarker for Post-Traumatic Cardiac Dysfunction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Right Ventricular Dynamics in Tricuspid Regurgitation: Insights into Reverse Remodeling and Outcome Prediction Post Transcatheter Valve Intervention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- A focus on the assessment of the autonomic function using heart rate variability.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Review
- Research progress in medical imaging for intracranial aneurysms: technological advances in diagnosis, management, and clinical integration.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Current Landscape, Clinical Impact, and Future Directions.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTechnological advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are redefining cardiac imaging by providing advanced tools for analyzing complex health data. AI is increasingly applied across various imaging modalities, including echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and nuclear imaging, to enhance diagnostic workflows and improve patient outcomes. HYPOTHESIS: Integrating AI into cardiac imaging enhances image quality, accelerates processing times, and improves diagnostic accuracy, enabling timely and personalized interventions that lead to better health outcomes.
methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted to examine the impact of machine learning and deep learning algorithms on diagnostic accuracy, the detection of subtle patterns and anomalies, and key challenges such as data quality, patient safety, and regulatory barriers.
resultsFindings indicate that AI integration in cardiac imaging enhances image quality, reduces processing times, and improves diagnostic precision, contributing to better clinical decision-making. Emerging machine learning techniques demonstrate the ability to identify subtle cardiac abnormalities that traditional methods may overlook. However, significant challenges persist, including data standardization, regulatory compliance, and patient safety concerns.
conclusionsAI holds transformative potential in cardiac imaging, significantly advancing diagnosis and patient outcomes. Overcoming barriers to implementation will require ongoing collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and regulatory bodies. Further research is essential to ensure the safe, ethical, and effective integration of AI in cardiology, supporting its broader application to improve cardiovascular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.