ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Continuous risk monitoring and management of heart failure: Rationale and design of the ALLEVIATE-HF trial.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shifting paradigms in ICD tachytherapy deactivation in the final phase of life: eighteen years of perspective.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026Article
- Continuity of primary care and its impact on prognosis in patients with heart failure referred for cardiology consultation.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Invasive and Non-Invasive Remote Patient Monitoring Devices for Heart Failure: A Comparative Review of Technical Maturity and Clinical Readiness.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A wearable belt for non-invasive monitoring of heart failure parameters.Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsEarly identification and management of worsening heart failure (HF) is necessary to prevent disease progression and hospitalizations. The ALLEVIATE-HF (Algorithm Using LINQ Sensors for Evaluation and Treatment of Heart Failure) trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial that aims to assess the safety and efficacy of using the Reveal LINQ™ insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) in patients with HF to continuously monitor and evaluate HF risk status and guide timely interventions.
methodsThe ICM algorithm uses parameters derived from electrocardiogram (atrial fibrillation [AF], ventricular rate during AF, heart rate variability, and night heart rate), three-axis accelerometer (patient activity duration), and subcutaneous bioimpedance (fluid volume, respiration rate). The trial will enroll ~760 patients with New York Heart Association class II or III HF with recent hospitalization for HF or needing intravenous diuretics in the outpatient setting or elevated natriuretic peptide levels, who do not have an implanted cardiac implantable electronic device or haemodynamic monitor. Patients are randomized to an observation or an intervention arm, where the latter will receive an intervention pathway with remote nurses implementing individualized pro re nata (PRN or 'as needed') 4-day medication interventions for acute volume management upon high risk. After 13 months of randomized follow-up, all patients enter an unblinded prolonged follow-up phase with PRN interventions upon high risk. The primary hierarchical composite endpoint for the study includes cardiovascular death, HF events, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, and 6-min walk test distance.
conclusionALLEVIATE-HF will evaluate how ICM-based HF management can impact the outcomes of patients with HF regardless of ejection fraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.