ArticleESC heart failure2025
Health-related quality of life across heart failure categories: associations with clinical characteristics and outcomes.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Vericiguat on Endothelial Function in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Pilot Randomized Study.The American journal of cardiology · 2026Trial
- Patient- and provider-level determinants of self-assessed health and well-being among adults with chronic conditions in Slovenian primary care.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Article
- Health-related quality of life and six-month hospitalization in older outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a prospective observational study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Observational
- Health-related quality of life across heart failure categories: associations with clinical characteristics and outcomes.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe study aims to examine characteristics and outcomes associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved, mildly reduced and reduced ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF). METHODS AND
resultsData on HRQoL were collected in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF; 2000-2021) using the EuroQoL 5-dimensional visual analogue scale (EQ 5D-vas). Baseline EQ 5D-vas scores were categorized as 'best' (76-100), 'good' (51-75), 'bad' (26-50) and 'worst' (0-25). Independent associations between patients' characteristics and EQ 5D-vas, as well as between EQ 5D-vas and outcomes were assessed. Of 40 809 patients (median age 74 years; 32% female), 29% were in the 'best', 41% in the 'good', 25% in the 'bad' and 5% in the 'worst' EQ 5D-vas categories, similarly distributed across all EF categories. Higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was strongly associated with lower EQ 5D-vas regardless of EF categories, followed by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking, body mass index, higher heart rate, anaemia, previous stroke, ischaemic heart disease, use of diuretics and living alone, whereas higher income, male sex, outpatient status and higher systolic blood pressure were inversely associated with lower EQ 5D-vas categories. Patients in the 'worst' EQ 5D-vas category as compared with the 'best' had the highest risk of all-cause death [adjusted hazard ratios 1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64-2.37 in HFrEF, 1.77, 95% CI 1.30-2.40 in HFmrEF and 1.43 95% CI 1.02-2.00 in HFpEF].
conclusionsMost patients were in the two highest EQ 5D-vas categories. Higher NYHA class had the strongest association with lower EQ 5D-vas categories, across all EF categories. Patients in the worst EQ 5D-vas category were at the highest risk of mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.