ArticleJournal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists2026
Effect of cleft palate type and manufacturing method on feeding plate adaptation: A volumetric micro-computed tomography analysis.
Article in Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New Digital Workflow for the Use of a Modified Stimulating Palatal Plate in Infants with Down Syndrome.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFeeding plates for cleft palate patients have been used by clinicians for many years to temporarily close the oro-nasal communication until definitive treatment with surgical techniques. The current in vitro study aimed to evaluate the adaptation of the feeding plates manufactured by two different techniques for three cleft types. MATERIALS AND
methodsFeeding plates were manufactured with conventional compression molding (CM) and 3-dimensional (3D) additive manufacturing on main models representing bilateral cleft, unilateral right, and unilateral left cleft types (n = 10). The 3D volumetric space between the feeding plate and the corresponding main model was measured by micro-CT to evaluate the adaptation. The adaptation of the plates was assessed based on three different measurement regions: anterior, left, and right. Repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA), three factorial ANOVA, and post hoc Bonferroni tests were used as statistical analysis (α = 0.05).
resultsCM groups showed higher volumetric space measurements between the base and master model than 3D groups regardless of measurement region and cleft type, which refers to misfit (p < 0.05). Cleft type differed in the adaptation of 3D groups yet not in CM groups (p < 0.05). The volumetric space evaluation for the right measurement region resulted in higher values regardless of manufacturing method and cleft type (p < 0.05).
conclusionConsidering that 3D-printed feeding plates showed better adaptation compared to conventionally manufactured plates for all cleft types, 3D printing can be suggested as the manufacturing method of choice for feeding plates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.