ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025
Gender-specific outcomes in pilonidal sinus disease: Female outcomes after cleft lift surgery in a large prospective Danish cohort.
Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Treatment Outcomes for Primary Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study of 2222 Patients (2006-2020).International wound journal · 2026Article
- Shrinking follow-up duration in pilonidal sinus surgery, 1970-2020: a patient-weighted longitudinal analysis of 2,285 studies.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Review
- Pilonidal Disease: A Brazilian epidemiological study with an overview of 45,000 surgeries performed in the Unified Health System.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2026Article
- Gender-specific outcomes in pilonidal sinus disease: Female outcomes after cleft lift surgery in a large prospective Danish cohort.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimPilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a common condition particularly affecting young men. Females affected by the condition account for about 20% of patients and are rarely mentioned, much less studied specifically. In this study we evaluate the surgical outcomes in a female population following Bascom's cleft lift (BCL) surgery in primary extensive disease, non-healing wounds after previous surgery and recurrent disease in a large Danish cohort from a high-volume centre.
methodThe study is based on a prospective database established at Randers Regional Hospital in 2016. All patients undergoing BCL surgery from June 2016 until October 2022 were included in this study.
resultsIn all, 560 patients underwent BCL surgery at our centre during this period. Eighty-eight (15.7%) were women. Only 10 (11.3%) were operated due to primary extensive manifestations. The rest presented with either non-healing wounds after previous surgery (47.7%) or recurrent PSD (41%). Risk of recurrence in female patients was 30% higher than in male patients (risk ratio 1.30, 95% CI 0.79-2.09) and the risk of prolonged healing after BCL surgery was 46% higher in women compared to men (risk ratio 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.14).
conclusionFemale PSD patients may represent a subcategory of patients at higher risk of treatment failure and should be dealt with as such. Initially, few present with the need for extensive surgery. However, given the common occurrence of prolonged healing and recurrence, we recommend a minimal invasive approach when possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.