ArticleMedical physics2025
Model-based perfusion reconstruction with time separation technique in cone-beam CT dynamic liver perfusion imaging.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Model-based perfusion reconstruction with time separation technique in cone-beam CT dynamic liver perfusion imaging.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe success of embolization, a minimally invasive treatment of liver cancer, could be evaluated in the operational room with cone-beam CT by acquiring a dynamic perfusion scan to inspect the contrast agent flow. PURPOSE: The reconstruction algorithm must address the issues of low temporal sampling and higher noise levels inherent in cone-beam CT systems, compared to conventional CT.
methodsTherefore, a model-based perfusion reconstruction based on the time separation technique (TST) was applied. TST uses basis functions to model time attenuation curves. These functions are either analytical or based on prior knowledge (PK), extracted using singular value decomposition of the classical CT perfusion data of animal subjects. To explore how well the PK can model perfusion dynamics and what the potential limitations are, the dynamic cone-beam CT (CBCT) perfusion scan was simulated from a dynamic CT perfusion scan under different noise levels. The TST method was compared to static reconstruction.
resultsIt was demonstrated on this simulated dynamic CBCT perfusion scan that a set consisting of only four basis functions results in perfusion maps that preserve relevant information, denoise the data, and outperform static reconstruction under higher noise levels. TST with PK would not only outperform static reconstruction but also the TST with analytical basis functions. Furthermore, it has been shown that only eight CBCT rotations, unlike previously assumed ten, are sufficient to obtain the perfusion maps comparable to the reference CT perfusion maps. This contributes to saving dose and reconstruction time. The real dynamic CBCT perfusion scan, reconstructed under the same conditions as the simulated scan, shows potential for maintaining the accuracy of the perfusion maps. By visual inspection, the embolized region was matching to that in corresponding CT perfusion maps.
conclusionsCBCT reconstruction of perfusion scan data using the TST method has shown promising potential, outperforming static reconstructions and potentially saving dose by reducing the necessary number of acquisition sweeps. Further analysis of a larger cohort of patient data is needed to draw final conclusions regarding the expected advantages of the TST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.