Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39871384›Full record

ArticleMicroscopy research and technique2025

Evaluation by Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy of the Effects of Root Canal Instrumentation on the Radicular Dentine.

Corina-Alexandra Brinza, Mihaela Salceanu, Anca Melian, Ionut Taraboanta, Ramona Cimpoesu, Cristian-Levente Giuroiu, Ion Sandu, Sorin Andrian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microscopy research and technique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Corina-Alexandra BrinzaFaculty of Dental Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
Mihaela SalceanuFaculty of Dental Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
Anca MelianFaculty of Dental Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
Ionut TaraboantaFaculty of Dental Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
Ramona CimpoesuFaculty of Science and Material Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University, Iasi, Romania.
Cristian-Levente GiuroiuFaculty of Dental Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
Ion SanduAcademy of Romanian Scientists (AORS), Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4088-8967
Sorin AndrianFaculty of Dental Medicine, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One area of technological advancement has been the shift from stainless steel hand tools to nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary tools. This paper aims to perform an in vitro comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of five endodontic manual and rotary instruments such as Kerr files, Orodeka Plex V, ProTaper Flydent NiTi super files, and ProTaper Flydent NiTi super files in combination with an ultrasonic endodontic E3D Diamantata EMS scaler used for root canal shaping. The following aspects were highlighted: effective removal of smear layer (SL) from the dentinal tubules in the coronal 1/3, middle 1/3, and apical 1/3 of the root canal, appearance of cracks in the dentinal walls by SEM analysis, and highlighting of dentin mineral content and remnant debris by EDX analysis. In the study, 48 monoradicular, uninjured teeth were taken and divided into four groups, each with 12 teeth to be canal modeled, then longitudinally sectioned; the active surface was metallized for SEM-EDX analysis. From the SEM micrograph analysis, the morphology of the crystallites, the distribution of SL components, and the highlighting of instrumentation path traces/amplitudes were observed. By analyzing the SEM photomicrographs at 750 and 800× magnification, it was possible to highlight the cracks in the root dentinal walls. Thus, in comparison with Lots I and II which did not present cracks, in Lot III multiple cracks of the root dentinal walls were identified, especially in the coronal 1/3, and in Lot IV cracks were present with preponderance in the coronal and apical 1/3 of the root canals. The EDX images with atom mapping show very well the rather homogeneous elemental distribution for Ca, N, and P, respectively inhomogeneous for Na, Ca, Si, C, N, O, and P elements, as a result of the presence of remnant products from the processing of the root dentinal walls. Root canal instrumentation performed with both manual Kerr needle instrumentation by a convection technique and the rotary, Orodeka system, by crown-down technique, resulted in minimal SL formation in all three root canal areas, unlike the ProTaper FlyDent system. Most cracks were recorded in the case of the ProTaper Flydent rotary instruments and the one in which it was paired with a diamond ultrasonic scaler. The occurrence of dentinal cracks causes a decrease in dentinal microhardness, favoring the occurrence of root fractures.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityDentinRoot Canal PreparationTooth RootDental InstrumentsHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNickelSmear LayerSpectrometry, X-Ray EmissionTitaniumNickelTitaniumdentine fissuresendodontic instrumentsSEM–EDXsmear‐layer

Identifiers

PMID39871384
PMCPMC11972449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.