Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39871371›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Driving job satisfaction through inclusive knowledge management: a focus on learning and communication in diverse workplaces.

Sobia Naseem, Muhammad Mohsin, Khalid Jamil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sobia NaseemSchool of Economics and Management, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, Hunan, China. sobiasalamat4@gmail.com.
Muhammad MohsinSchool of Business, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology, Loudi, China.
Khalid JamilCollege of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examines the impact of knowledge management practices (KMP) on job satisfaction, focusing on the mediating roles of learning opportunities and communication quality. It aims to provide insights into how effectively KMP can enhance employee satisfaction in Pakistan's IT sector.

methodThe research utilizes cross-sectional data collected from 345 IT sector employees in Pakistan. A survey method was employed, using a structured questionnaire to gather the necessary data. The data was then analyzed to determine the relationships between KMP, learning opportunities, communication quality, and job satisfaction.

resultsThe findings reveal that KMP has a significant positive impact on job satisfaction. Additionally, KMPs are found to positively influence learning opportunities and communication quality, which in turn significantly contribute to job satisfaction. The results demonstrate that learning opportunities and communication quality mediate the relationship between KMP and job satisfaction. DISCUSSION: This study recommends that the IT sector in Pakistan can improve job satisfaction by developing effective KMP that supports learning and communication quality. These practices also enhance employee satisfaction and are compatible with the identified strategic objectives of a knowledge-based economy in Pakistan's framework. In addition, this research extends the theoretical literature on the relationship between KMP and job satisfaction, with learning opportunities and communication quality as mediating factors. It offers important implications for IT firms and presents a foundation for future studies to examine potential moderators and replicate these results in other industries and geographies.

Indexed as

CommunicationJob SatisfactionKnowledge ManagementLearningWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPakistanSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCommunication QualityIT SectorJob SatisfactionLearning Opportunities

Identifiers

PMID39871371
PMCPMC11771126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.