Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39871355›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2025

A new method for detecting mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and reconstructing constituent strains provides insights into transmission.

Benjamin Sobkowiak, Patrick Cudahy, Melanie H Chitwood, Taane G Clark, Caroline Colijn, Louis Grandjean, Katharine S Walter, Valeriu Crudu, Ted Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic epidemiology ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimizing culture-free approaches to recover high qualitymedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benjamin SobkowiakDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Disease, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, USA. bs2259@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1382-1137
Patrick CudahyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Melanie H ChitwoodDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Disease, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, USA.
Taane G ClarkFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Caroline ColijnDepartment of Mathematics, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive West, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Louis GrandjeanDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Katharine S WalterDivision of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Valeriu CruduPhthisiopneumology Institute, Strada Constantin Vârnav 13, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
Ted CohenDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Disease, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMixed infection with multiple strains of the same pathogen in a single host can present clinical and analytical challenges. Whole genome sequence (WGS) data can identify signals of multiple strains in samples, though the precision of previous methods can be improved. Here, we present MixInfect2, a new tool to accurately detect mixed samples from Mycobacterium tuberculosis short-read WGS data. We then evaluate three approaches for reconstructing the underlying mixed constituent strain sequences. This allows these samples to be included in downstream analysis to gain insights into the epidemiology and transmission of mixed infections.

methodsWe employed a Gaussian mixture model to cluster allele frequencies at mixed sites (hSNPs) in each sample to identify signals of multiple strains. Building upon our previous tool, MixInfect, we increased the accuracy of classifying in vitro mixed samples through multiple improvements to the bioinformatic pipeline. Major and minor proportion constituent strains were reconstructed using three approaches and assessed by comparing the estimated sequence to the known constituent strain sequence. Lastly, mixed infections in a real-world Mycobacterium tuberculosis population from Moldova were detected with MixInfect2 and clusters of recent transmission that included major and minor constituent strains were built.

resultsAll 36/36 in vitro mixed and 12/12 non-mixed samples were correctly classified with MixInfect2, and major strain proportions were estimated with high accuracy (within 3% of the true strain proportion), outperforming previous tools. Reconstructed major strain sequences closely matched the true constituent sequence by taking the allele at the highest frequency at hSNPs, while the best-performing approach to reconstruct the minor proportion strain sequence was identifying the closest non-mixed isolate in the same population, though no approach was effective when the minor strain proportion was at 5%. Finally, fewer mixed infections were identified in Moldova than previous estimates (6.6% vs 17.4%) and we found multiple instances where the constituent strains of mixed samples were present in transmission clusters.

conclusionsMixInfect2 accurately detects samples with evidence of mixed infection from short-read WGS data and provides an excellent estimate of the mixture proportions. While there are limitations in reconstructing the constituent strain sequences of mixed samples, we present recommendations for the best approach to include these isolates in further analyses.

Indexed as

CoinfectionMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisComputational BiologyGene FrequencyGenome, BacterialHumansWhole Genome SequencingBioinformaticsGenomic epidemiologyMixed infectionMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39871355
PMCPMC11771024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.