SynthesisBMC medical education2025
A systematic review of the impact of artificial intelligence on educational outcomes in health professions education.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of deep machine learning in dental education: a systematic review of effectiveness in dental students' teaching learning outcomes.Evidence-based dentistry · 2026Pooled it
- Use of large language models for providing automated feedback in medical imaging education: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Large language models for primary care ophthalmic education: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Content and structural needs assessment for an artificial intelligence education mobile app in healthcare: a mixed methods study.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence (AI) for social innovation in health education: promoting health literacy through personalized ai-driven learning tools - a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of generative AI on health professional education: A systematic review in the context of student learning.Medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic education, training and research: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Health Education and Practice: A Systematic Review of Health Students' and Academics' Knowledge, Perceptions and Experiences.International nursing review · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-powered virtual standardized patients in teaching history-taking skills to medical students: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Effects of artificial intelligence based physiotherapy educational approach in developing clinical reasoning skills: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Utility of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Japanese Medical Interview Training: Randomized Crossover Pilot Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Trial
- Integrating ChatGPT into knowledge-retrieval tutorials in undergraduate medical education: a prospective evaluation of higher-order learning and feasibility.Medical education online · 2026Article
- AI-Empowered Nuclear Medicine Education, Part 1: Theoretical and Ethical Foundation.Journal of nuclear medicine technology · 2026Article
- [Urological training wards - a viable solution to the shortage of healthcare professionals?]Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- AI for Clinical Competency Assessment: Scoping Review of Methods and Applications.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- AI literacy and ethical attitudes toward AI in medical students: evidence from a structural model.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Clinical Teaching Models in Traditional Chinese Medicine: Historical Evolution and Contemporary Integration.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Review
- Mapping Current Use of Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacology Education via a Scoping Review.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Perceptions, Attitudes, and Use of AI by Medical Students: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- AI-Generated Microlearning for Plastic Surgery Residency: Single-Arm Pre-Post Feasibility Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has a variety of potential applications in health professions education and assessment; however, measurable educational impacts of AI-based educational strategies on learning outcomes have not been systematically evaluated.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted using electronic databases (CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, Proquest, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to identify studies published until October 1st 2024, analyzing the impact of AI-based tools/interventions in health profession assessment and/or training on educational outcomes. The present analysis follows the PRISMA 2020 statement for systematic reviews and the structured approach to reporting in health care education for evidence synthesis.
resultsThe final analysis included twelve studies. All were single centers with sample sizes ranging from 4 to 180 participants. Three studies were randomized controlled trials, and seven had a quasi-experimental design. Two studies were observational. The studies had a heterogenous design. Confounding variables were not controlled. None of the studies provided learning objectives or descriptions of the competencies to be achieved. Three studies applied learning theories in the development of AI-powered educational strategies. One study reported the analysis of the authenticity of the learning environment. No study provided information on the impact of feedback activities on learning outcomes. All studies corresponded to Kirkpatrick's second level evaluating technical skills or quantifiable knowledge. No study evaluated more complex tasks, such as the behavior of learners in the workplace. There was insufficient information on training datasets and copyright issues.
conclusionsThe results of the analysis show that the current evidence regarding measurable educational outcomes of AI-powered interventions in health professions education is poor. Further studies with a rigorous methodological approach are needed. The present work also highlights that there is no straightforward guide for evaluating the quality of research in AI-based education and suggests a series of criteria that should be considered.
trial registrationMethods and inclusion criteria were defined in advance, specified in a protocol and registered in the OSF registries ( https://osf.io/v5cgp/ ). CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.