ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025
Differential responses of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating GERMs: how genotype, environment, and rhizosphere microbiome interactions underlie heat response in maize and sorghum.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Shifting from biotic to abiotic drivers of urban microbial multifunctionality under drought and rehydration.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
- Investigating GERMs: How Genotype, Environment, and Rhizosphere Microbiome interactions underlie heat response in maize and sorghum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Effects of planting density and foliar fertilization on the phyllosphere microbial community of dual-purpose soybean.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous monocultures alter the composition and function of root-associated microbiota, and thus compromise crop health and productivity. In comparison, little is known about how leaf-associated microbiota respond to continuous monocultures. Here, we profiled root and leaf-associated microbiota of peanut plants under monocropping and rotation conditions. Additionally, their protective effects against root pathogen Fusarium oxysporum and leaf pathogen Alternaria alstroemeriae were evaluated. We found that monocropping increased root and leaf disease severity. Meanwhile, the peanut growth and productivity were inhibited by monocropping. Microbiota analysis revealed that monocropping reduced rhizosphere microbial population and diversity, while increased leaf epiphytic microbial population and did not influence leaf epiphytic microbial diversity. Cropping conditions had a greater impact on the microbiota composition of leaf epiphytes than that of the rhizosphere. Moreover, in vitro and in vivo experiments, combined with correlation analyses showed that monocropping weakened the antagonistic activity of rhizosphere microbiota against F. oxysporum and root rot disease. This effect may be associated with the depletion of Bacillus sp. and Sphingomonas sp.. By contrast, leaf epiphytic microbiota under monocropping exhibited greater inhibition of A. alstroemeriae growth and leaf spot control. Together, our results demonstrated a differential response pattern of root and leaf-associated microbiota to continuous monocultures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.