Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39871328›Full record

ReviewEcho research and practice2025

Echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation: a practical guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography.

Kelly Victor, Liam Ring, Vasiliki Tsampasian, David Oxborough, Sanjeev Bhattacharyya, Rebecca T Hahn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Echo research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelly VictorCleveland Clinic London, 33 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7HY, UK. VICTORK@ccf.org.
Liam RingWest Suffolk Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bury St Edmunds, UK.
Vasiliki TsampasianNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
David OxboroughResearch Institute of Sports and Exercise Science and Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Sanjeev BhattacharyyaCleveland Clinic London, 33 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7HY, UK.
Rebecca T HahnColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic regurgitation is the third most common valve lesion with increasing prevalence secondary to an ageing population. Transthoracic echocardiography plays a vital role in the identification and assessment of aortic regurgitation and proves essential in monitoring severity and determining the timing of intervention. Building on the foundations of previous British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) recommendations, this BSE guideline presents an update on how to approach an echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation. It provides a practical, step-by-step guide to facilitate a comprehensive, high-quality echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation. It discusses commonly encountered echocardiography-based challenges with suggestions regarding how this information is relevant in the interpretation and grading of regurgitation severity. Additionally, the value of other cardiac imaging modalities is discussed. The guideline concludes with an overview of aortic regurgitation in the clinical context, addressing chronic versus acute aortic regurgitation, which features prompt referral for intervention, and the consequences of combined valve disease.

Indexed as

Aortic insufficiencyAortic regurgitationEchocardiographyGuideline

Identifiers

PMID39871328
PMCPMC11773781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.