ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Monitoring of perioperative tissue perfusion and impact on patient outcomes.
Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional tissue perfusion index (RTPI): a new optical-based metric for quantifying regional tissue perfusion.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- The Role of Biomarkers in Personalized Anesthesia: From Physiological Parameters to Molecular Diagnostics.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- From Pandemic to Practice: How COVID-19 Has Reshaped Haemostasis in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Preliminary Quantitative Evaluation of the Optimal Colour System for the Assessment of Peripheral Circulation from Applied Pressure Using Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring perioperative tissue perfusion is crucial in clinical anesthesia to protect organs and ensure patient safety. Indicators like hemodynamic parameters, tissue metabolism, and microcirculation markers are used for assessment. Studies show intraoperative hypotension negatively impacts outcomes, though blood pressure alone may not reflect tissue perfusion accurately. Cardiac output is a more direct measure, with adequate levels generally indicating good perfusion. However, some conditions cause adequate cardiac output but inadequate perfusion. Non-quantitative markers like skin color and temperature, and quantitative indicators like tissue oxygen saturation and laser Doppler flowmetry, help assess microcirculation but can't fully evaluate systemic perfusion. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) monitors tissue oxygen metabolism, reflecting oxygen supply and consumption balance. Central venous oxygen saturation offers a better systemic overview but may not always indicate good perfusion, especially in sepsis. Lactic acid levels closely correlate with tissue perfusion and outcomes, with dynamic changes being more indicative than single measurements. Effective monitoring requires evaluating both macro- and microcirculation states and systemic metabolic levels to ensure optimal outcomes. Combining these measures provides a more accurate assessment of tissue perfusion and patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.