Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39871259›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Intensive care nurses' experiences of teamwork during the covid-19 pandemic. a qualitative study.

Jeanette Eckerblad, Åsa Dorell, Helen Conte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeanette EckerbladDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels Allé 23 Huddinge, Stockholm, SE-141 83, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8241-4973
Åsa DorellDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels Allé 23 Huddinge, Stockholm, SE-141 83, Sweden. asa.dorell@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1413-7916
Helen ConteDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels Allé 23 Huddinge, Stockholm, SE-141 83, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6967-528X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeamwork is a core competence for all health care professionals and quality of care is a vital outcome. The pandemic backdrop of 2020-2022 led to initial chaos and adaptation of the nurses' roles and responsibilities in the intensive care unit. Therefore, the purpose was to describe the intensive care nurses' experiences of working in teams during the Covid-19 pandemic and discussing the results through the lens of transitiontheory.

methodsIndividual and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 intensive care nurses. The interview transcripts were analysed using Braun & Clarke's six-step inductive thematic analysis.

resultsThe intensive and critical care nurses' experiences during the first 18 months of the Covid-19 pandemic captured chronological and conceptual commonalities, which were represented in three themes, "Losing the security of the ICU team", "Having time to adapt and finding structure for collaborative work", and "Gaining professional growth through adapting collaborative work to contextual challenges".

conclusionLosing the security of the intensive care unit team, having to adapt to constant changes, and the need to provide care to an increased number of critically ill patients led to a sense of being left to manage on their own. The intensive care unit nurses missed the interprofessional collaboration that had previously been a core part of their professional role. The adaptability and willingness to find solutions helped nurses regain control, manage the challenges they faced and find new ways to collaborate. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Intensive care unitsNursingPandemicsQualitative researchTeamTransition

Identifiers

PMID39871259
PMCPMC11771016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.